Get a great new deal on comics toys and more every 24 hours!

Archive for the ‘New Movie Reviews’ Category

Avatar Movie Review

Sunday, December 27th, 2009 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2009
Director: James Cameron
Script:
James Cameron
Cast: Sam Worthington, Zoë Saldaña, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Sigourney Weaver

In 1986, James Cameron gave us Aliens, a movie which climaxed with Sigourney Weaver going head to head with a queen Xenomorph in a power lifter – despite the acid-spitting extra-terrestrial’s superior design it was clearly no match for human technology. Almost twenty-five years later, James Cameron’s Avatar has flipped this standard on its head. Now us money grabbing earthlings in our walking tanks are the bad guys, stripping the beautiful planet Pandora of life in order to mine its valuable resources. Oh how things have changed…

Avatar - Zoe Saldana as Neytiri

Avatar - Zoe Saldana as Neytiri

Those who have balked at Avatar’s disappointing teaser trailer and eco-themed premise will be pleased to know that Cameron’s knack for subtlety is still non-existent. Avatar is a simplistic epic that both falls prey to the early “Dances with Wolves in space” dismissals while looking sure to change the minds of millions of naysayers. While Avatar doesn’t quite live up the hype preceding it – what movie possibly could? – that it survives such grand expectations unscathed is pretty incredible in itself.

When his twin brother is killed in a random mugging, disabled veteran Jake Sully (Worthington) is presented the opportunity to travel to the moon Pandora and take his place on an Avatar project, which allows him to remotely control a genetically engineered alien/human hybrid. The aliens in question are the tribal Na’vi: ten foot tall blue humanoids that share a symbiotic relationship with their planet.

While Pandora’s atmosphere is similar to Earth’s, its air is not breathable by human lungs, making the avatars the only method with which to study the Na’vi up close – the military forces on Earth want the valuable unobtainium that is under the Na’vi’s sacred Hometree, see. As Sully’s avatar is slowly accepted by the tree-dwellers, he quickly falls in love with Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña), which soon conflicts with his obligation to his own species.

You don’t have to be a Hollywood script surgeon to see where Avatar’s plot is heading; indeed the majority of the film’s problems stem from Cameron’s clumsily paced screenplay. While 20th Century Fox were willing to throw a rumoured $300mil on the project, it appears nobody had the guts to tell the self-proclaimed King of the World that his script needed some work. While the dialogue doesn’t quite reach Lucas’s depths of cringe-worthiness, several poorly defined characters and such horrendous sci-fi terms as “unobtainium” (the resource which humanity so desperately seeks) occasionally shake you out of what is an otherwise immersive experience.

But again, Cameron is no George Lucas. Whereas Lucas struggled to inject life into his CGI universe, resulting in unconvincing computer-generated characters and poorly staged battle sequences, Cameron’s skills as a director, if not writer, have adapted perfectly to Pandora’s virtual forests. For all its problems, Avatar truly delivers during its last 30 minutes, with a battle that is both epic and personal, and unlike the aforementioned Star Wars prequels, keeps track of its central characters despite its scale.

The human actors come second to Pandora itself, but there are some decent performances here. Sigourney Weaver’s botanist Grace is a Ripley for the green generation, while Sam Worthington’s crippled turncoat is not nearly as bland as others have written. Stephen Lang’s heavily scarred Colonel Miles Quaritch is both a highlight and a letdown; like something that stepped straight out of a 1980s Saturday morning cartoon, Quaritch is both mesmerising and yet so ridiculously plays to the testosterone-pumping villain stereotype, that the movie severely wants for an antagonist as three-dimensional as the luscious effects.

But it’s Zoe Saldaña as Na’vi love interest Neytiri that lingers in the memory longest. Using state of the art motion-capture technology, Saldaña’s animalistic expressions have been captured with a delicacy that even outdoes Andy Serkis’ work as Gollum. In true Cameron tradition, Neytiri is no damsel in distress either, matching Sully as a warrior during the immense finale.

Despite Avatar’s many flaws, it’s this assured direction that holds it together through the occasional awkward moment. At close to 3 hours, it rarely drags, and feels like the first genuine blockbuster spectacle since the Matrix wowed us in 1999. Whether Cameron’s hackneyed, effects-driven plot will stand up so well in 2D or on the small screen is another matter entirely. But Avatar was intended to be seen in 3D, and see it in 3D you must.

9/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Harry Brown Film Review

Thursday, November 12th, 2009 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2009
Director: Daniel Barber
Script: Gary Young
Cast: Michael Caine, Emily Mortimer, Charlie Creed-Miles, David Bradley, Iain Glen, Jack O’Connell, Jamie Downey, Ben Drew, Liam Cunningham

Harry Brown is the kind of movie best viewed with an open mind and an empty conscience. This tale of an elderly Royal Marine veteran who decides to police his run-down council estate with lethal force, is an undeniably brave, confrontational film that will evoke either bloodthirsty cheers or equally vocal disgust.

But boy is this film relevant. In an age where paedophiles are released with paltry cautions and delinquent teens are immune to the law, Harry Brown is certainly a film of and for it’s time. Some might argue that the sadistic revenge plot is little more than an excuse for a violence-driven strain of pornography; a right-winger’s fantasy in which chav scum are euthanized with a bullet to the head. That they’re probably right doesn’t make Harry Brown any less satisfying.

Michael Caine as Harry Brown

Michael Caine as Harry Brown

Comparisons to Death Wish, Dirty Harry and the recent Gran Torino are all valid, but director Daniel Barber paints his feature but with such a thick layer of filth that Harry Brown is more in line with Shane Meadow’s Dead Man’s Shoes. The heavy score slams your senses with such a sense of foreboding that it’s difficult not to slip into Harry’s doomed battle with his nightmarish past. Unlike that last movie, there is little effort here to humanise the scum of South London, with Brown’s prey so bluntly depicted as primitive – one particular drug dealer is almost insect-like – creatures of the night that they might as well have fangs, glowing eyes and neon cross-hairs emblazoned on their foreheads.

Yet it’s Michael Caine’s turn as the eponymous crime fighter that gives Harry Brown a much needed dose of humanity. It’s arguably the 76 year-old’s finest role, and propelled by Gary Young’s slow-burning script Caine throws so much into Harry that his transformation from abandoned widower into wheezy killing machine is somehow not only plausible but oozes more cool than a dozen other more franchisable action heroes. There’s also some able support in David Bradley as Harry’s one remaining friend Leonard, whose murder by the tunnel-dwelling hoodlums sets everything in motion.

Ultimately, Harry Brown’s greatest failing is that Barber clearly has something to say, but struggles to decide exactly what that something is. The subplot involving Emily Mortimer’s earnest police officer feels severely underdeveloped, while the film’s bleaks epilogue might have been poignant had Barber not taken such glee in Harry’s trail of murder. And the film’s apparent message, that neighbourhoods would be safer for all if residents enacted bloody vengeance on local miscreants, is juvenile enough to leave a bad taste in all but the most amoral and fascistic male teen.

Gruesome and morally-confused Harry Brown might be, yet placed alongside such derivative revenge flicks as Taken it feels remarkably fresh. Amidst South London’s bleak cityscapes, it’s impossible not to root for Caine’s weary vigilante. Few of those viewers who do happen to leave Harry Brown feeling dirty and ashamed will deny that behind the stylised carnage are some thought-provoking themes; it’s just a shame that Barber and Young didn’t have the courage to take these topics in a more cerebral direction.

7/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Watchmen Movie Review

Monday, March 9th, 2009 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2009
Director: Zack Snyder
Script:
David Hayter, Alex Tse
Cast:
Malin Akerman, Billy Crudup, Matthew Goode, Carla Gugino, Jackie Earle Haley, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Patrick Wilson

A bit like the archetypal half-caste kid who is unwanted by both the bloodlines he is born into, anyone brave enough to tackle as monumental a project as bringing Alan Moore’s Watchmen to the big screen is going to suffer condemnation from fanboys and Joe Public alike. So richly marinated in its own alternate history, Moore’s multi-layered plot would only alienate those unfamiliar with the source material, while any creative tinkering with the treasured characters or plot would have the comic book community crying out for blood.

Watchmen movie

Watchmen movie

Though more prolific (and arguably more talented) director’s including Terry Gilliam, Darren Aronofsky and Paul Greengrass have been associated with the project, Zack Snyder’s intentions for the adaptation cannot be faulted. But in keeping so rigidly to the graphic novel, his three hour effort loses its vigour, suffering pacing problems that a more confident auteur may have worked around. I say “may”, for in all honesty Watchmen is, as expressed by Moore time and again, quite unfilmable. That Snyder grafts something both comprehensible and entertaining out of Moore’s multi-layered magnum opus is in itself an achievement.

I shan’t excessively elaborate on Watchmen’s dense plot, as I feel somewhat obliged to. The year is 1985, Nixon is on his fourth term, the superpowers have one another in their missile sights, superheroes have been outlawed, and retired crime buster The Comedian has just been murdered. Like the graphic novel from whence it came, Watchmen is less a plot than an elaborate series of ideas and themes which explore what the superhero would mean to a world that actually required one. The incredible title sequence, which flashes through Moore’s elaborate history to the wails of Bob Dylan, compete with re-enacted Kennedy assassination and moon landing, fills in the initiated as well as could possibly be expected.

The casting is a mixed bag. Jackie Earle Haley excels as the sociopathic Rorschach, and is mesmerising both with and without the inkblot mask. Fellow Little Children actor Patrick Wilson brings an encumbered charm to Nite Owl, whose bookish impotence and muscular frame shift with a change of costume. Jeffrey Dean Morgan is also pretty good as the sadistic Comedian, a character whose presence lingers long into the movie despite dying pre-titles. And Dr Manhattan, brought to life by Billy Crudup, is a soulless and inexpressive CGI creation; though in this case that’s entirely the point.

Unfortunately, these performances are balanced out by several jarringly bad ones. Malin Ackerman’s Silk Spectre II is bland and vacant, while Matthew Goode is unbelievably ill-cast as Ozymandias, the world’s smarted man, delivering his lines with the confidence of a talent show contestant. And while modern special effects can render a big blue penis with startlingly flaccidity, the aging effects on Carla Gugino’s original Silk Spectre are poorer than those used on Back to the Future II some 20 years ago.

Few films will suffer such intricate dissection as Watchmen, and with nearly a quarter of a decade to manifest itself in the head of everyone who’s read it, Moore’s novel has achieved a level of omnipotence that would make Dr Manhattan shift towards an envious green. But the book itself was not without its flaws, and though by maintaining the film’s 1985 setting Snyder absolves himself of some of the more dated ideas, while also identifying Watchmen from its contemporary imitators, the film frequently feels as though it needs swifts surgery with a pair of scissors.

Snyder’s slick, synthetic visuals too often invite Naked Gun levels of lampoonery yet the film lacks the wit of Moore’s work, as well as the sense of playfulness of ideas that he’s long revelled in. Uncompromising in its vision it may be, but the film is at times feels inhumane; for all his visual flair, Snyder doesn’t know when to hold back. Slow motion drags at every punch and CGI button, while flashbacks stay so faithful to the book that they seem out of synch.

The levels of violence and sexual gratuity are also sporadic but surprisingly high; though the original graphic novel was indeed violent, it never lingered on these moments for the sake of sensationalism. I get the sense that Snyder associates adult storytelling with splatter flicks and soft porn, as did the many comic writers and artists that latched onto the wave of “adult” comics from the late 80s onwards.

If this review has chiefly travelled a negative path, that may be because it’s so easy to pick at Watchmen; but there’s an awful lot to love. Neither the classic it could have been, nor the abomination it should have been, Watchmen’s clusterfuck of ideas hit far more times than they miss. One only has to read about the PG-friendly, Happy Meal viable Hamm and Hayter scripts to appreciate that this movie could have been much, much worse. Though it is tempting to make large of Snyder’s directorial shortcomings, he has guts, if not the soul to give his character’s that essential layer of humanity.

8/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Justice League: The New Frontier DVD Review

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews
2008, Warner Bros.
Director:
Dave Bullock
Written by:
Stan Berkowitz, Darwyn Cooke
Cast:
Kyle MacLachlan, Jeremy Sisto, Lucy Lawless, Neil Patrick Harris, David Boreanaz, Phil Morris, Miguel Ferrer, Brooke Shields, Kyra Sedgwick

While DC’s first direct-to-video animated film Superman: Doomsday wasn’t disastrous, for the sake of brevity it abandoned all but a few key features of the original comic arc and was overall an unenthusiastic and lifeless affair. From New Frontier’s introductory narrative, which concludes on the narrator blowing his brains out, to the razor sharp Hitchcock inspired 50s title sequence, DC’s second animated feature is an altogether classier act, with a level of maturity that will appeal to older viewers without alienating the littluns.

Much of New Frontier’s success can be put down to its source material. There are few graphic novels in DC’s back catalogue that are better suited to such an animated movie. What Darwyn Cooke did so well with New Frontier was provide both an accessible introduction to the DC Universe and an intelligent allegory on McCarthyism, the Cold War and the civil rights issues of 50s America. Though the original graphic novel was labelled an Elseworlds title, New Frontier follows the super-powered individuals that will soon form the Justice League of America, even if there technically isn’t a JLA in this movie. Each character’s origin slotted perfectly into Cooke’s intricate tale without deviating unrecognisably from canon.

Justice League: The New Frontier DVD

Justice League: The New Frontier DVD

Certain scenes have had to be cut from that book, notably the ill-fated Losers expedition on Dinosaur Island and the grim John Henry Iron/white supremacist subplot, but these are still referenced in the movie, if only to appease the more particular viewers. My favourite plot strand, the Martian Manhunter’s teleportation to Earth by Dr. Erdel, and his use of the Chandleresque detective guise John Jones, is kept intact. It’s also great to see other characters that have yet to be oversaturated in other media, with B-listers as Adam Strange, Rick Flag, Challengers of the Unknown, Will Magnus and the Blackhawks making appearances too.

Aesthetically, the film is animated in a charmingly retro style that fits somewhere between Darwyne Cook’s art, the Fleisher Superman cartoons and Batman: The Animated Series which Cooke did indeed work on. The voice acting is also superb, as is Kevin Manthei’s score, which is in turns ominous and uplifting.

As with Cooke’s source material, the impending world threat The Center – a living island that, um, shoots dinosaurs – is a complete cop-out. But by the time the world’s finest have combined their forces for the first time, you’ll be enjoying it all too much to really care.  New Frontier is an absolute delight; it’s got more heart than most live action superhero movies, and should be seen by everyone with an interest in the DCU.

8/10

  • Share/Bookmark

The Spirit Movie Review

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2009
Director:
Frank Miller
Script: Frank Miller
Cast:
Gabriel Macht, Samuel L. Jackson, Scarlett Johansson, Eva Mendes, Dan Lauria, Sarah Paulson, Paz Vega, Stana Katic, Jaime King, Louis Lombardi

Frank Miller’s directorial debut sees him emulating Rodriguez emulating Miller emulating Will Eisner, in this turgid adaptation of the seminal crime-fighter comic strip. Whereas Sin City glamorised audiences into forgiving its superficiality, a dire script and overbearingly flamboyant visuals bleed The Spirit of any potential charm or wit. The film suffers from a schizophrenic tone, shifting from the urban, chiaroscurist noir of Sin City to the buffoonish camp of Adam West’s Batman – the villainous Octopus’s (Jackson) army of cloned goons even have their rhyming names emblazed across their matching outfits.

The Spirit - Scarlet Johanson

The Spirit - Scarlet Johanson as Silken Floss

Gabriel Macht struggles as the stoic, square-jawed hero, as though he can’t decide whether the role’s as an errant klutz or vigilante sociopath. Given the dialogue he is forced to deliver, one can’t blame him. The entire supporting cast embarrass themselves with every line of woefully clumsy dialogue they spew. Samuel L. Jackson, wearing marker pen makeup and sporting an ensemble of increasingly ridiculous outfits and marker pen, can find solace in the fact that he’s achieve the impossible, making his getup in Jumper look positively elegant in comparison.

Only Stana Katic, as perky rookie Morgenstern, captures the wide-eyed sanguinity that should have emanated from every character in Central City, whose inhabitants have names like Sand Serif and Silken Floss. Like Sin City, the roster of scantily-clad lasses make one wonder why they didn’t just enlist Scarlett Johansson, Jaime King (at one point dressed as a Nazi dominatrix) and company into an unabashed porno flick; Eva Mendes’ ass features such a prominent role that it deserves its own mention in the end credits.

So what of the plot? Burgeoned by ham fisted allusions to Greek mythology, it really doesn’t warrant any time longer spent on it than Frank Miller spent writing it. That the spirit recounts his origin story – a convoluted mess that completely misses Eisner’s engaging minimalism – to a random alley cat pretty much says it all. The inclusion of the Spirit’s infamous minstrel sidekick Ebony White may have proven controversial, but he would have at least provided a valuable source of exposition.

The visuals, while impressive in moments such as the rooftop chases, are used with the reservation of a group of quarrelling film undergraduates. Miller smothers every hollow scene with so many layers of gloss that the movie often resembles a James Bond title sequence.

The Spirit is a failure by all accounts. What could have been a fun, colourful pastiche of a hero belonging to yesterday is instead a pretentious, soulless homage to nothing in particular. In resurrecting The Spirit for the big screen, Frank Miller has ironically killed the character’s future prospects as well as his own. Expect the various projects associated with his name, including the Buck Rogers revamp, to dissipate as if never were.

2/10

  • Share/Bookmark

The Prestige Movie Review

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2006
Dir: Christopher Nolan
Script:
Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan
Cast:
Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Scarlett Johansson, David Bowie

As stage ingeneur John Cutter (Caine) explains during The Prestige’s opening, there are three stages of a magic act: the pledge; in which the magician shows us something ordinary, the turn; in which the magician “takes the ordinary something and makes it do something extraordinary”, and finally the prestige, in which that something is brought back. Christopher Nolan has exhibited his empty palms, and with a nod free of pretension, incited anticipation of the trickery to come. The audience participates in The Prestige as spectator to illusionist. We watch with full knowledge that we are being setup up; we are entering the pledge.

The Prestige

The Prestige

Concentrating on the backstage intricacies of rival Victorian illusionists Alfred Borden (Bale) and Robert Angier (Jackman), The Prestige steals the magic from the stage show; the real mystery is located under floorboards and behind locked workshop doors. The complex workings of Angier’s The Real Transported Man result in a fairly basic, though implausible, illusion, but again like the Victorian spectator, we are far more interested in the how than the feat itself.

The two protagonists are parallel opposites; the aristocratic Angier a master showman low on ingenuity, while carpenter’s son Borden possesses a genuine understanding of the workings of magic but lacks charisma and stage presence. The morally ambiguous, progressively obsessive rivalry escalates as the increasingly complex narrative entangles. Neither character is purely good or bad, with both ultimately victims of their, all-consuming, vengeful natures.

Loosely adapting Christopher Priest’s novel of the same name, Nolan abandons Priest’s modern day frame story and downplays the spiritualist themes. The trademark Nolan neurosis are present, predominantly identity, obsession and duality.

Nolan places his own symbolism within the film, providing us with metaphors that on first viewing lie inconspicuously within the story, only in retrospect allowing the film to open up and expand like some intricate stage device. Tesla’s machine embodies magic versus science, old versus new, tradition versus technology, spiritualism versus the machine. Angier and Borden’s bitter rivalry draws parallels with Nikola Tesla’s competition against Thomas Edison, the domineering of an unexplored frontier of science, a modern day replacement for magic and spiritual belief.

The Prestige’s Victorian setting; a time of great social change and scientific breakthrough marked perhaps not the end of the stage magician, but the gradual dissipation of the fantastical that the illusionist provoked; henceforth, industrial innovation would provide the world all its marvels.

8/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Hellboy II Movie Review

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2008
Director: Guillermo del Toro
Script: Guillermo del Toro, Mike Mignola
Cast: Ron Perlman, Selma Blair, Doug Jones, Jeffrey Tambor, Luke Goss, Anna Walton, John Hurt

As much as it may agitate the bitter pro-auterist cinephile, there’s a lot to be said for imposed creative restriction. If the excessive Brontosaurus chase in the recent remake of King Kong proved one thing, it’s that failing to contain a man of Peter Jackson’s imagination and aptitude on such a vast project will only result in on-screen indulgence.

Hellboy II - Ron Perlman

Hellboy II -Ron Perlman

Likewise, Guillermo del Toro’s Spanish efforts, particularly The Devil’s Backbone and the awards darling Pan’s Labyrinth, have regularly proven far more intimate efforts than his Hollywood offerings. Admittedly, I’ve loved those too; but there was the sense in both Blade 2 and the original Hellboy that despite his unarguable talent, our favourite Mexican (sorry Benicio, Speedy) does not know when to stop. During Hellboy II’s more cluttered moments it could be argued that the director doesn’t know when to hold back the ideas, but I for one am grateful for his shortcoming.

Like Jackson’s did with Kong, with Hellboy II del Toro pays tribute to the movie monsters of  old; Harryhausen, Hammer and even anime such as Princess Mononoke. Unless you were a twelve year-old weaned on video games and reality TV it was difficult not to be worn down by Hellboy’s succession of monster fights, with the more interesting character moments each feeling like an interval between the last creature encounter and the next. Del Toro has added twice as many such fights to this predecessor, yet Hellboy 2 never loses focus of its characters. The monsters themselves are possibly the most ingenious and original seen on screen, all presented with an appreciation and affection not before captured outside of a Harryhausen creation.

So, the story… as with the original Hellboy, del Toro spends so much time lavishing his heroes and their antagonists with “little moments” that there is barely room for a plot. Essentially repeating his underrated performance in Blade II, Luke Goss excels as the spear swinging Prince Nuada, Elf Prince of the Underworld, a title that is far less discomfiting in the context of the film. Many critics have criticised Goss for impressing the necessary sense of menace, but that’s perhaps the point; though his methods are a tad extreme Nuada is arguably the good guy, the spokesperson for nature’s retaliation against man. But as del Toro piles the action on one scene after the next, his plight does get somewhat lost.

Ron Perlman is once again great as the eponymous, blue-collar demon, lending the character a sympathetic edge that the recent iteration of Batman lacked. Red is the downtrodden clean-up guy who never gets his due, and we can’t help but love him for it. Doug Jones, now adding his voice to the gill-man Abe Sapien is equally compelling, while Seth MacFarlane adds comic relief as the ethereal German, Johann Krauss. Oddly it’s Selma Blair’s Liz Sherman, the only member of our crew who is human in appearance, who feels underdeveloped and uninteresting.

Hellboy 2 doesn’t surpass the likes of The Dark Knight, nor was it ever going to. This is a silver screen experience of brawn over brains, a heavy handed second helping for those who enjoyed the first. Del Toro has no pretensions about his work, and has produced a piece of cinematic fluff that is not only visually and imaginatively sumptuous, but treats its cast of misfits with genuine affection.

8/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Wall E Movie Review

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2008
Director: Andrew Stanton
Script:
Andrew Stanton, Jim Reardon, Andrew Stanton, Pete Docter
Cast:
Ben Burtt, Elissa Knight, Sigourney Weaver, Jeff Garlin, Fred Willard, John Ratzenberger, Kathy Najimy

After the delightfully oddball concoction Ratatouille, Pixar has moved further still from family movie conventions with Wall E, the tale of a diminutive recycling robot (a Waste Allocation Load Lifter Earth-Class) continuing to operate on a barren Earth long after mankind has trashed the place and buggered off. When the sleek, iPod-inspired probe EVE hits Earth, our lonely trash compactor’s love for her takes him to the stars and beyond.

Wall E

Wall E

Given that Pixar created such an empathetic entity as Luxor Jr. from a hopping desk lamp, it should be no surprise that Wall E is capable of displaying more humanity than most live actors. That the stout lovechild of Short Circuit’s Johnny 5 and a Nintendo Gamecube, with almost no associable human features, is one of the most endearing and sympathetic heroes of the last decade is testament to Pixar’s two principal crafts: the very finest animation, and an earnest, heartfelt approach to storytelling which no amount of Disney/DreamWorks success formulae will ever recreate.

It’s almost a waste of a paragraph to mention Wall E’s animation. Since Toy Story made the jaws of 1995 plummet, computer generated imagery has matured to a level where it has become possible to enjoy these animated features without even considering the level of labour which goes into such a work. Photorealistic at times, Wall E’s uninhabited world is impressively detailed; the mountains of junk that now tower over our dilapidated cities never seem to repeat, nor do the household items our inquisitive robot explores. Many of Pixar’s other efforts also make wry cameos, often as plastic Happy Meal toys.

For any other studio, such affectionate touches would warm our hearts and tickle our intellects, but this attention to detail has almost become a prerequisite of Pixar. Sadly, like Cars, Wall E does not quite reach the colossal expectation that greets all of the studio’s films, due in most part to the second half’s somewhat sentimental human sequences. Bloated, slothful and technologically dependent to the point that our bone masses have decreased, our species is in a sorrowful state. Despite helmer Andrew Stanton’s initially cynical tone, one which sees Mother Nature as a now precious commodity, the film eventually takes a more forgiving approach, treating those who destroyed our Earth with maternal fondness rather than contempt.

But though this tactless sentimentality jars with any anti-consumerist message that Stanton was presumably headed towards at some point – I will conveniently ignore the fact that Wall E has already spawned millions of merchandising products, many of which will end up as landfill – we must bear in mind that this is a kid’s film. A superlatively glum and sceptical kid’s film with a bright and happy ending, then.

As much of an achievement as Wall E is, it’s difficult to believe that even the most apathetic of cinemagoers will leave their seats without some small feeling that it could have been something great. Is it fair to criticise an excellent film for not being great? Probably not. But again, only Pixar would be scorned for a tailoring a family film for the littl’uns by sprinkling in two ingredient often missing from postmodern cinema; hope and forgiveness. We’re ungrateful bastards.

8/10

  • Share/Bookmark

Star Wars: The Clone Wars Movie Review

Monday, August 18th, 2008 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2008
Director: Dave Filoni
Written by: Henry Gilroy, Steven Melching, Scott Murphy
Voice Cast: James Arnold Taylor, Matt Lanter, Ashley Drane, Tom Kane, Christopher Lee, Samuel L. Jackson

There’s a noticeable lack of grandeur in the very first minutes of Clone Wars. Gone is the scrolling text, replaced by a recap montage and a Starship Trooper-esque commentary which would feel more at home in Futurama. Had this been a Matt Groening production we would already be laughing, in on the joke. Yet this is Star Wars, and Lucas and his many subordinates are not big on satire or irony. Or indeed the declining public perception of their space opera universe.

In probably the weakest plot to have graced any Star Wars spin-off, Jabba the Hutt’s son Rotta (though he is more frequently referred to as “Stinky”) has been kidnapped by the Dooku led Separatists, who hope to dominate the Hutt trading routes. And, er… that’s about it. Cue ninety minutes of action as Anakin Skywalker, Obi-Wan Kenobi and Yoda jet off to save him. Set between Episodes II and III, this film is more in tone with the former, with the reckless and difficult to like Anakin continuing to demonstrate why he should never have been trained in the ways of the Jedi. On the plus side, the woeful Lucas trade politics have been trimmed down; though they’re still present in one cringingly out of place scene.

Star Wars: The Clone Wars

Star Wars: The Clone Wars

Amongst the familiar faces there are several new additions to the Star Wars universe. Though she originally appeared in the more inventive Genndy Tartakovsky 2003 Clone Wars series, Dooku’s Sith apprentice Asajj Ventress has a far more prominent role here. Like Darth Maul she’s a visually impressive villain with a cool lightsaber gimmick but little in the way of personality; she’s emrely evil for evil’s sake. Ahsoka Tano, Anakin’s sudden and unappreciated padawan, is clearly aimed at the younger audience. Spunky, motor-mouthed, and somehow less annoying as the film progresses, she’s far from the ext Jar Jar Binks, and is arguably one of the few characters in the entire prequel chapter with any spirit. More suited to the Jar Jar comparisons is Ziro the Hutt, who is best described as a blend of Jabba the Hutt and South Park’s Big Gay Al. Even in this Henson-puppet populated universe, he’s one of the most bizarre aliens ever conceived; thankfully his screen time is short.

The Clone War’s Supermarionation inspired art direction has picked up a far greater number of detractors than fans. Admittedly it is initially off-putting. The backgrounds are flat digital paintings, while the coarse character models look as though they’ve been scrubbed with acrylic paint. Obi-Wan Kenobi’s beard is strangely solid like a Grecian statue’s. In many ways Anakin and company look more like action figures than digital actors; quite ironic given the nature of this franchise.

Had this film been broadcast in its original format, it just might have been hailed as a masterstroke in movie-to-television franchise expansion, and its computer generated characters placed at the top of their game. While I for one enjoyed the super-stylised animation style, the fact remains that placed alongside the likes of Wall E and Shrek, The Clone Wars lacks the polish to justify its big screen promotion.

So how does The Clone Wars compare to the most recent live action features? Surprisingly well, really. Many people flocked to cinemas (albeit in comparatively modest numbers) anticipating the seventh Star Wars movie. I shuffled to my multiplex expecting to watch three episodes of a Saturday morning cartoon edited together. And that’s exactly what we get. Star Wars does feel at more at home when inhabited by computer rendered entities as opposed to actors hamming it up against green screens; both the effeminate Ziro and the ridiculously ineffective droid army are definitely more forgivable in the context of a children’s cartoon.

6/10

  • Share/Bookmark

The Dark Knight Movie Review

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008 by Carl Doherty under New Movie Reviews

2008
Director: Christopher Nolan
Script: Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan, David S. Goyer
Cast:
Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman, Aaron Eckhart, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Morgan Freeman, Eric Roberts, Cillian Murphy, William Fichtner

Outside of the animated feature Mask of the Phantasm, Batman has never really received the cinematic treatment he deserves. Despite a large canvass for intelligent, creative storytelling in the comic medium, the world’s foremost rodent-themed detective has never been given the thought provoking movie adaptation that comic writers such as Frank Miller, Grant Morrison and Jeph Loeb have provided again and again. Even Nolan’s excellent Batman Begins began to creak once the origin story had been dealt with.

The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

I can’t help but find it amusing than in a year of little CGI robots, big CGI Hulks and billionaires in CGI flying suits, audiences would rather see a knife-wielding psychopath in greasepaint. Let’s put Heath Ledger’s untimely death and the post-humus Oscar debacle aside; the Joker dominates Nolan’s twisted plot from the very first scene – a meticulously orchestrated bank robbery with a dark sense of humour that would not feel out of place in a Coen brothers piece. A malevolent force of destruction devoid of reason or redemption, Joker’s ostensibly chaotic masterplan pushes Batman further than ever before, forcing impossible decisions upon him in the hoper that he will accept the futility of his fight.

Despite Bruce Wayne’s technology, and the fact that financially he has Gotham at his disposal, he can neither comprehend nor predict the Joker’s unhinged game theory. More importantly, he cannot bring himself to kill him. It’s this theme that carries The Dark Knight, adding gravitas to the impeccably paced cat and mouse charade, enhanced to no end by Han Zimmer’s exhilarating yet elegant score, which at times intensifies to spine tingling levels. Though there are several big buck car chases, the Nolans and screenwriter David Goyer should be applauded for constructing a three man face-off which satisfies every requisite of the summer blockbuster without compromising the plot’s personal level.

The Dark Knight has drawn multitudinous comparisons to The Godfather II, yet in many ways it is better compared to the first Godfather. Whereas that film took a pulp genre often associated with square-jawed dicks and moronic goons and gave it depth and heart, The Dark Knight has taken not only Batman, but superhero movies in general, up a notch. Christopher Nolan’s ambitions often yield convoluted and arguably pretentious results, but he is a filmmaker of the utmost integrity and, more importantly, taste. Not once does he shatter our suspension of disbelief or, as is often the case with superhero movies, abuse the high budget allocated him.

As with almost every other critique of this film, I have only praised Ledger’s performance. And it’s a shame that Bale, Oldman, Caine and Eckhart have been overshadowed by the late actor, as they all perform exceptionally. Aaron Eckhart plays Harvey Dent/Two-Face, the tortured variety of villain we are so accustomed to with absolute sincerity, though his character’s descent into dualistic madness is unfortunately overshadowed by the clown. Gary Oldman has a far more prominent role this time round, his character sitting somewhere in the middle of the three extremes. Maggie Gwyllenhal, taking over from Katie Holmes, plays the again underwritten Rachel Dawes, who seems to have survived a second movie simply to tick the obligatory love interest box.

But this is a negligible whinge; it is almost impossible to think of one element that could have been pulled form The Dark Knight without the entire film collapsing. Impeccably paced and immaculately conceived, The Dark Knight is the antithesis of the summer blockbuster. It may occasionally teeter on pompousness, but this is intelligent, sophisticated and poignant entertainment… with a frequently ingenious violent streak.

10/10

  • Share/Bookmark